![]() |
Voluntary Euthanasia - murder or mercy? |
In the New
Zealand Parliament, right now, a private members bill is being draft to
legalize euthanasia. Last night I attended a Discussion hosted at the
Wellington Museum with about 150 people attending. The panel was {L to R} : Dr Anne
Maclennan, (Palliative Care); Janet Marsland (Voluntary Euthanasia Society):
Paul Russell (HOPE); Dr Grant Morris (Law School).
You can
find the issues in the debate elsewhere; they would be similar in most western
countries. John Kleinsman's article "No case for killing society's most vulnerable" summarizes our present NZ discussion well. I am only giving a couple of reflections from last night’s meeting.
Turning
Doctors into Executioners.
Because the
meeting was conducted politely, given the dignified surroundings of the Museum,
I did not say this out loud: “You want our doctors to become executions!”
Janet
Marsland gave some heart-wrenching cases of people seeking to die and, in all
honesty, she said that legalizing the assisting of the terminally ill to die
would mean killing them. It was pointed out that we don’t need doctors to do
that; some other trained professional could do it!
My thought
was, given the legal prescription around mercy-killing, which Grant Morris
would want in place, the person coming into the room, no matter how dignified
the circumstances, would be acting like an executioner who kills in a humane
way by lethal injection.
It is
repugnant to me to presume that doctors should carry out that duty. As part of
the fabric of our culture we hold dearly to the clause “Do no harm” written in
medical codes of conduct. If the Vulnerable, such as the comatose, the mentally
impaired and the severely disabled cannot trust our doctors not to yield to
pressure to kill them, then we are well on the slope to barbarism.
Protecting
the Vulnerable
This brings
me to my second reflection, that the law against Euthanasia protects the
Vulnerable. As Paul Russell put it: “Patients need to know that their doctor
can’t kill them.” Drawing on her experience in palliative care, Anne Maclennan
said that it was very rare that a patient has a persistent desire to be
euthanized. When it does occur, it is most often because of other issues which
can be worked out. She, in particular, inspired me to protect the Vulnerable by seeking to maintain the law as it stands.
For the Dangers see:
The Dangers of Euthanasia: A Statement from the New Zealand Catholic Bishops
For the Dangers see:
The Dangers of Euthanasia: A Statement from the New Zealand Catholic Bishops
No comments:
Post a Comment